Website Analysis

This article is in support of arming teachers in  schools. I could only find one decent article relating to the subject that was mostly qualified.

Article 1 - http://news.discovery.com/human/could-arming-teachers-work-20130102.htm

1. Is there an author? Is the page signed?

Yes, Eric Niiler

2. Is the author qualified and/or reputable? An expert?

He is a reporter who researches topics, including this one. He is not an expert, but he asks people who know more than him. 

3. Who is the sponsor?

Discovery News

4. Is the sponsor of the page reputable? How reputable?

Yes, very. 

5. If the page includes neither a signature nor a sponsor, is there any other way to determine its origin?

N/A

6. Are there links that take you outside of the site?

Yes

7. Is the information reliable and error-free?

Yes

8. Is there an editor or someone who verifies/checks the information?

Yes

9. Where doubt exists, can the information be cross-checked with a reliable source?

Yes

10. Does the information show a minimum of bias?

Yes

11. Is the page designed to sway opinion?

To some extent, yes

12. Is there any advertising on the page?

To other articles on the site, yes 

13. Is the page dated?

Yes

14. If so, when was the last update?

January 3, 2013

15. How current are the links? Have some expired or moved?

Very current

16. Is there an indication that the page has been completed, and is not still under construction?

The topic of discussion is still in debate, but the article ends without need for additional construction.

17. If there is a print equivalent to the Web page, is there a clear indication of whether the entire work is available on the Web or only parts of it?

Entire work is posted.

18. What topics are covered? How in-depth is the material?

"Could Arming Teachers Work?" "Can Gun Laws Save Lives?" "US Guns by the Numbers" "Where the Gun Laws are Most Lenient"

If all the links are followed, the information can be very detailed.